What's new

What if kayang mabuhay ng mga tao ng hundred years?

Phc sisnduw

Honorary Poster
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Posts
475
Reaction
172
Points
238
May mga scientist na naka reverse aging ng daga. What if gumana
den sa atin yun? Dagdag pa ang AI na papalitan daw tayong lahat sa work? Like parang Jarvis ni iron man. Mag kakaroon daw tayong lahat ng sariling AI sa future. Anong thoughs niyo sa mga to?
 
yes AI talaga magiging personal assistant na natin in the near future, 1000x more smarter than chat GPT. pero yung ina-abangan ko talaga is yung brain implants at advancement sa neuroscience..
 
mga theist lang ang against diyan, but it can happen anytime soon as science acquires more and more data
 
hindi na magiging balance ang lahat magiging overpopulated ang mundo dahil matagal na buhay ng tao oras oras may pinapanganak pero konti nalang ang mamatay bawat oras lalamang ang bilang ng mga taong ipapanganak
 
Kung meron niyan .accessible lang sa mga super powerful person . Or baka meron na hindi lang public .
 
Kung meron niyan .accessible lang sa mga super powerful person . Or baka meron na hindi lang public .
Malamang sa umpisa ganyan. Ung pagiging matanda ay magiging simbulo ng kahirapan. That is if umabot pa tayo sa edad na tatanda tayo. Kasi kung wala nang natitirang trabaho, ewan ko kung pano tatanda pa ung mga hindi afford mag extend ng buhay.

Pero kung sabihin natin maging mass produced yung technology para sa lahat, I wonder kung kaya ihandle ng conciousness ng tao umabot ng 200 or more years. AI might even decide hindi na necessary ang organic conciousness ng tao. There is no reason for AI to keep us around.

Human population will definitely decline kasi wala nang purpose ang pagkakaroon ng anak, bagkus liability lng ito, so overpopulation will not be an issue.
 
Last edited:
hindi na magiging balance ang lahat magiging overpopulated ang mundo dahil matagal na buhay ng tao oras oras may pinapanganak pero konti nalang ang mamatay bawat oras lalamang ang bilang ng mga taong ipapanganak
Edi wag tayo mag anak simple.

Malamang sa umpisa ganyan. Ung pagiging matanda ay magiging simbulo ng kahirapan. That is if umabot pa tayo sa edad na tatanda tayo. Kasi kung wala nang natitirang trabaho, ewan ko kung pano tatanda pa ung mga hindi afford mag extend ng buhay.

Pero kung sabihin natin maging mass produced yung technology para sa lahat, I wonder kung kaya ihandle ng conciousness ng tao umabot ng 200 or more years. AI might even decide hindi na necessary ang organic conciousness ng tao. There is no reason for AI to keep us around.

Human population will definitely decline kasi wala nang purpose ang pagkakaroon ng anak, bagkus liability lng ito, so overpopulation will not be an issue.
Dagdag mo naren ang magiging pananaw naten sa edad. Pag 18 years old baby palang sa future. Mga tao mag kakaroon na ng chance mag palit ng career sa bawat century ng buhay nila. Malilito na tayo sa edad syempre. Sa sports baka makita pa ulit naten si Pacquiao, Jordan at Ronaldo lahat ng top players mag laro ulit. About naman sa AI di tayo sure dyan. Remember wala naman silang emotion para mag decision so pano nila ma iisipin yan. Saka ginawa sila para tulungan lang ang mga tao.
 
Last edited:
Edi wag tayo mag anak simple.


Dagdag mo naren ang magiging pananaw naten sa edad. Pag 18 years old baby palang sa future. Mga tao mag kakaroon na ng chance mag palit ng career sa bawat century ng buhay nila. Malilito na tayo sa edad syempre. Sa sports baka makita pa ulit naten si Pacquiao, Jordan at Ronaldo lahat ng top players mag laro ulit. About naman sa AI di tayo sure dyan. Remember wala naman silang emotion para mag decision so pano nila ma iisipin yan. Saka ginawa sila para tulungan lang ang mga tao.
Humanity sucks. Sana nga palitan tayo ng AI.
 
Yung AI ba na yan ay yung may capability matuto? If so, hindi sya dapat ma create. Ang limit lang na AI dapat ay nasa basics lang na hindi natututo at walang auto-prediction at learning program.

Unpredictable ang nature ng Tao, and if mag exist ang Learning AI, para lang tayo gumagawa ng sariling pamukpok sa ulo natin...

Ayoko sana gumamit ng Fiction movies for reference pero that is exactly the nature of an AI with a capability to learn and evolve which can endanger Humanty...
 
Remember wala naman silang emotion para mag decision
Yun ngs yung point e. Wala silang emotion. Wala silang emotional attachment sa organic na buhay like we do. Ang hindi natin alam na part ay kung hahayaan ba natin sila mag decide para satin sa future.

"Ginawa sila para tulungan tayo".. hindi nalalayo sa idea noong unang panahon kung saan naniniwala tayo na ang mga alipin ay ginawa pra tulungan ang amo niya. Pag nag advance na ang AI, hindi ba ang goal ay magkaroon sila ng sarili "sentience". In a way, parang tao na sila mag isip. Hindi malabo na magkaroon ng issue sa future ang pagbibigay ng AI rights na pareho sa human rights.

Ayoko sana gumamit ng Fiction movies for reference pero that is exactly the nature of an AI with a capability to learn and evolve which can endanger Humanty...
There is a reason kung bakit may mga fiction movies na ganyan. Kasi naiisip na natin ang possibility na gnyan mangyayari satin if we do things wrong. (That is if meron tamang way pra gawin mga bagay).
 
Wala silang emotion. Wala silang emotional attachment sa organic na buhay like we do.
wow this is very nice, no longer carried away by emotion which means decisions are now based on logic, emotion only makes people weak and incompetent
 
wow this is very nice, no longer carried away by emotion which means decisions are now based on logic, emotion only makes people weak and incompetent
This is definitely dangerous, without proper emotional understanding, you can create a killing machine without due trials and emotional detection to perceive what is true...
 
This is definitely dangerous, without proper emotional understanding, you can create a killing machine without due trials and emotional detection to perceive what is true...
killing originates from emotion, trials in court does not involve emotion, so it's the other way around hehe
 
killing originates from emotion, trials in court does not involve emotion, so it's the other way around hehe
For crimes punishable by death, you need emotions to at least find your humanity and give forgiveness... it could also work the other way around and incur death penalty, but without emotions, it's a one-sided ending which is killing in cold blood.
 
For crimes punishable by death, you need emotions to at least find your humanity and give forgiveness... it could also work the other way around and incur death penalty, but without emotions, it's a one-sided ending which is killing in cold blood.
yes trials in court does not involve emotions, so if court decides to kill you it's not by emotion, so emotions can be discarded in everything, there's no such a thing as mercy and forgiveness in law

no one will able to hate anyone, only the law decides, if emotion is removed
 
Last edited:
yes trials in court does not involve emotions, so if court decides to kill you it's not by emotion, so emotions can be discarded in everything, there's no such a thing as mercy and forgiveness in law
It is all fun and good until it happens to yourself.
Just a tip of advice, always be careful when making a choice that can't be taken back.
 
no one will be able to feel good or bad if emotions are removed so it no longer makes sense
Based on this one I think we are not on the same page hahaha.
I Was thinking about AI coexisting with humans as their replacement only for work...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top