Trivia Can Men get pr3gnant?

[GildartsTale]

​

​

​

​

The ONLY answer is a big NO.​

Simple illustration:​

Suppose you put men(biological men) on a deserted island. Leave them for 100 years. You can back after, and all you can see is the deserted island with no men. End of story.​

 

[plhbg1]

hypothetical yung illustration mo boss, it means ang pinaglalaban mo only applies to hypothetical contexts

 

[Asherah Goddess]

Papaano kung nagkatotoo nga? Magagalit ka? Esummon mo po si "Paul" para manermon uli. Tatawagin ko na ang Goddess para protektahan sila. Joke.​

 

[GildartsTale]

hypothetical yung illustration mo boss, it means ang pinaglalaban mo only applies to hypothetical contexts

Even if its hypothetical it's remains true.

 

[plhbg1]

Even if its hypothetical it's remains true.

categorical yan boss, true or hypothetical, there is no such thing as true and hypothetical

 

[GildartsTale]

categorical yan boss, true or hypothetical, there is no such thing as true and hypothetical

The truth of the hypothetical illustration is about men can never be *******t.

Papaano kung nagkatotoo nga? Magagalit ka? Esummon mo po si "Paul" para manermon uli. Tatawagin ko na ang Goddess para protektahan sila. Joke.​

Sabihin mo yan ni plhbg1 kasi yung biology will never change kasi hired wired sa DNA

 

[plhbg1]

The truth of the hypothetical illustration is about men can never be *******t.

hehe sabi ko categorical nga yan, meron specific categories, there is no in between

Sabihin mo yan ni plhbg1 kasi yung biology will never change kasi hired wired sa DNA

she's also being hypothetical boss, yung biology hard code ko hindi yun hypothetical

 

[GildartsTale]

hehe sabi ko categorical nga yan, meron specific categories, there is no in between

Kahit how you play the word game. Men can never be pr3gnant.

 

[plhbg1]

Kahit how you play the word game. Men can never be pr3gnant.

then stop using hypothetical illustrations, another thing, pre̾gnancy is an attribute based on se̾x and not gender, just like women can breastfeed, if pupunta tayo sa gender it doesn't matter what a woman identifies herself kahit seasons pa identity niya ay mabubuntis talaga yan kasi it doesn't care about gender, it only respects the se̾x

 

[GildartsTale]

then stop using hypothetical illustrations, another thing, pre̾gnancy is an attribute based on se̾x and not gender, just like women can breastfeed, if pupunta tayo sa gender it doesn't matter what a woman identifies herself kahit seasons pa identity niya ay mabubuntis talaga yan kasi it doesn't care about gender, it only respects the se̾x

Hypothetical illustration will help anong punto ko. Wag kasi e complicate the fact remain that men cannot get pr3gnant. S3x = Gender.

 

[plhbg1]

Hypothetical illustration will help anong punto ko.

yeah it helped me realized that your claim only applies to hypothetical contexts

Wag kasi e complicate the fact remain that men cannot get pr3gnant. S3x = Gender.

ehehe it is very clear that pre̾gnancy discriminates gender from se̾x, it doesn't follow both, it only respects se̾x, the discriminating power of pre̾gnancy has broke your equation

 

[GildartsTale]

yeah it helped me realized na your claim only applies to hypothetical contexts

said your opinion?

ehehe it is very clear the pre̾gnancy discriminates gender from se̾x, it doesn't follow both, it only respects se̾x, the discriminating power of pre̾gnancy has broke your equation

no it does not. s3s = gender. when I say men it is biological men. And it's the truth.

 

[plhbg1]

said your opinion?

it is you who just said that it should help me see your point hehe

no it does not. s3s = gender. when I say men it is biological men. And it's the truth.

hehe but sadly you just used pre̾gnancy which discriminates further gender from se̾x

 

[GildartsTale]

it is you who just said that it should help me see your point hehe

hehe but sadly you just used pre̾gnancy which discriminates further gender from se̾x

nope it does not discriminate. it solidify that gender = s3x

 

[Asherah Goddess]

Ah. Naiintindihan ko na. Iniintindi ko ang sinusulat ng tao dito. Ito ang pagkakaintindi ko. Dinidefend na lalake at babae lamang biologically in gender, literal speaking and ang seks is lalake at babae lamang.... well.... unconciously na the reason why nasasabi iyan ng tao pabor sa ganyan ay because they focus only in procreation , tama ba ako?

Procreation is nakalagay in the bible text po e. Lalake at babae lamang ang ginawa. Babae ay magpaparami ng anak. Gets ko na. It is a reason why dinidisregard ng tao ang mga tao na non-binary. It is a reason why hindi sila pabor sa katagang fluidity ng gender mismo bagkus naniniwala sila na ang gender is fix.

So kapag lumampas ang lalake at babae sa ganyan assign role sa kanya , ayaw na. Hindi na pwede. Ganerin? Napapatanong ako na bakit hindi gusto ng tao ang fluidity ng gender mismo? Ang gusto ay fix lang ang gender po literal speaking? Hindi na natural para sa akin. Masyado kase siya rigid, masyado siya force, hindi flexible, masyado siya stiff , firm..... for me.... hindi na siya natural. Human being is meron niyan naturaliza. Seks is natural. Pinigilan. Ngayon. Kasal muna bago seks.

Katulad ng dati. Non-procreation po siya dati. Norms ika nga. Seks sa both lalake. Seks sa both babae. Seks sa magkaibang gender. Hindi siya nakatitig sa procreation , alam niyo iyon? M(a)sturbate is also normal.

Si Paul na naaalala ko na against sa non-procreation na gawain normal noon , kaya nga nagalit siya dati na nagtalik ang both men during ritual of a priestess po e.

So kapag naka-focus ang tao sa procreation na paulit-ulit na keyso lalake ay hindi pwede mabuntis at babae lang ang pwede mabuntis, isa lang ang ibig sabihin niyan. As long as nakatutok sila sa procreation, malamang sa malamang, maiisip ng tao na ang gender is fix at hindi siya fluid. Puros nakatutok sila sa biological lang na lalake at babae lamang. Ayun lang ang role nila. Iyon ang sinasabi na truth kuno na actually, the reason why nasasabi nila iyon is dahil nakatutok sila sa procreation.

Non-procreation ang dati dahil diba? Polytheist pa noon. Meron God at Goddess. Malakas ang influential ng Goddess within sa society po. Gender fluid kung baga. Iyon ang sinasabi na truth and reality kuno na lalake at babae lamang. Nasasabi nila iyon as truth subjectively dahil na constuct na siya na ganoon dapat especially nakalagay na sa written text in bible na lalake at babae lang ang pwede mag procreate. Kaya hindi maipasok sa isip sa mga tao na pabor sa gender binary as a whole na originally, fluid ang gender noon. Ang naturo sa kanila is procreation lang raw from men and women.

Bakit masyado kase nakatutok lamang sa lalake at babae as in? Ayaw ba ng tao na magkaroon ng fluidity in gender para lahat ng gender is equal? Para lahat ay pantay na? Ganun lang naman ang thoughts ko.​

 

[plhbg1]

nope it does not discriminate. it solidify that gender = s3x

claim lang na it solidify without any justification at all hay nako

 

[GildartsTale]

claim lang na it solidify without any justification at all hay nako

According to whom na walang justification? Sayo? hay nako.

 

[plhbg1]

According to whom na walang justification? Sayo? hay nako.

based on your post bossing

 

[GildartsTale]

based on your post bossing

The post is already justified. Unless you see it different ways.

Let's flip that. Do you believe that men can get prëgnant?

 

[plhbg1]

The post is already justified. Unless you see it different ways.

haha justifying claim with another claim

Let's flip that. Do you believe that men can get prëgnant?

sabi ko na sayo walang issue ang pre̾gnancy sa se̾x, it fully respect se̾x, you don't even need to ask kasi alam mo yan at alam nating lahat na pre̾gnancy respects se̾x